untitled
  • Hey Webmasters! Get a free website with holiday themes - Get it NOW!

Abelaide Ontogoya Sectory 11
Page 08

Determine how Abelaide Ontogoya makes your day better.

Abelaide Ontogoya

Abelaide Ontogoya Home
Abelaide Ontogoya Sitemap
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 01
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 02
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 03
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 04
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 05
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 06
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 07
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 08
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 09
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 10
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 11
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 12
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 13
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 14
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 15
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 16
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 17
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 18
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 19
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 20
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 21
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 22
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 23
Abelaide Ontogoya Sct 24

Abelaide Ontogoya Sectory 11
Page 08

The Saas chronicler, indeed, avers that the chapels were not built till 1709--a statement apparently corroborated by a date now visible on one chapel; but we must remember that the chronicler did not write until a century or so later than 1709, and though, indeed, his statement may have been taken from the lost earlier manuscript of 1738, we know nothing about this either one way or the other. The writer may have gone by the still existing 1709 on the Ascension chapel, whereas this date may in fact have referred to a restoration, and not to an original construction. There is nothing, as I have said, in the choice of the chapel on which the date appears, to suggest that it was intended to govern the others. I have explained that the work is isolated and exotic. It is by one in whom Flemish and Italian influences are alike equally predominant; by one who was saturated with Tabachetti's Varallo work, and who can improve upon it, but over whom the other Varallo sculptors have no power. The style of the work is of the sixteenth and not of the eighteenth century--with a few obvious exceptions that suit the year 1709 exceedingly well. Against such considerations as these, a statement made at the beginning of this century referring to a century earlier, and a promiscuous date upon one chapel, can carry but little weight. I shall assume, therefore, henceforward, that we have here groups designed in a plastic material by Tabachetti, and reproduced in wood by the best local wood-sculptor available, with the exception of a few figures cut by the artist himself.

In 1067 the Conqueror kept a grand Christmas in London. He had spent eight months of that year rewarding his warriors and gratifying his subjects in Normandy, where he had held a round of feasts and made a grand display of the valuable booty which he had won by his sword. A part of his plunder he sent to the Pope along with the banner of Harold. Another portion, consisting of gold, golden vases, and richly embroidered stuffs, was distributed among the abbeys, monasteries, and churches of his native duchy, "neither monks nor priests remaining without a guerdon." After spending the greater part of the year in splendid entertainments in Normandy, apparently undisturbed by the reports which had reached him of discontent and insurrection among his new subjects in England, William at length embarked at Dieppe on the 6th of December, 1067, and returned to London to celebrate the approaching festival of Christmas. With the object of quieting the discontent which prevailed, he invited a considerable number of the Saxon chiefs to take part in the Christmas festival, which was kept with unusual splendour; and he also caused a proclamation to be read in all the churches of the capital declaring it to be his will that "all the citizens of London should enjoy their national laws as in the days of King Edward." But his policy of friendship and conciliation was soon changed into one of cruelty and oppression.

"James Citty," like all other settlements in all ages, had to have places for disposal of refuse. That much refuse was disposed of by casting it in the James River is unlikely, since before the dawn of history it has been a trait of man to live on top of his own refuse rather than litter a shore with it. While it may be that no pits were dug purposely for refuse disposal, pits opened for brick or ceramic clay (or dug for ice houses, wells, or other purposes and later abandoned) were used for dumping trash. In 1955 a refuse pit almost 40 feet square was discovered in the "industrial area" near the workshop, ironworking pit, and pottery kilns. Filled with trash from the first half of the 17th century, this pit contained such artifacts as a swepthilt rapier (made about 1600), a cutlass, the breastplate and backpiece of a light suit of armor, a number of utensils of metal, ceramics, and glass, to add to the collection of early 17th-century arts and crafts. Several smaller refuse pits were noted, and it is worth commenting that many ditches finally became trash accumulation areas.



[ Dir 11 Page 01 ] [ Dir 11 Page 02 ] [ Dir 11 Page 03 ] [ Dir 11 Page 04 ] [ Dir 11 Page 05 ] [ Dir 11 Page 06 ]
[ Dir 11 Page 07 ] [ Dir 11 Page 08 ] [ Dir 11 Page 09 ] [ Dir 11 Page 10 ] [ Dir 11 Page 11 ] [ Dir 11 Page 12 ]


This document is Copyright © 2008 Abelaide Ontogoya. All rights reserved. Do not copy either electronically or otherwise without permission. Links and references to other Websites are not endorsements. Abelaide Ontogoya provides no guarantees or warrantees concerning other sites. Links are only provided as a courtesy and for entertainment purposes only.

Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Allwebco Web Templates · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Audio, Fonts, Clipart
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com